IBM’s OS/2 2.1 (1993) was shipped in a number of national language versions (NLVs). At the time, the US version of OS/2 was the “master copy” and all NLVs were derived from it.  There were two major classes of NLVs: SBCS and DBCS. SBCS (Single-Byte Character Set) versions covered all but the Far East, which was served by DBCS (Double-Byte Character Set) versions.

The DBCS NLVs had their own hierarchy: Japanese OS/2 (also known as OS/2 J2.1) was derived from the US version, and other DBCS versions were in turn derived from OS/2 J2.1. The DBCS versions were noticeably different, with support for special hardware and in some cases requiring different device drivers (noticeably printer and video).

The CD-ROM releases of OS/2 2.1 were unusual in that there was a single “EMEA” CD which included 13 NLVs, but a box with French or German or UK OS/2 2.1 only contained bootable installation floppies for that one language version. A Russian version of OS/2 was packaged separately.

Several “Extended SBCS” versions of OS/2 also existed: Thai, Hebrew, and Arabic. These versions supported bi-directional output and/or special input methods, but were otherwise not fundamentally different from the standard SBCS versions of OS/2.

There were four major DBCS versions of OS/2: Japanese (OS/2 J2.1), Korean (OS/2 H2.1), Traditional Chinese (OS/2 T2.1), and Simplified Chinese (OS/2 P2.1). OS/2 T2.1 was available in two variants, 5550 and Big-5, named after the primary DBCS code page supported by the system; 5550 was an older IBM codepage, while Big-5 was a newer de facto standard.

“EMEA” OS/2 2.1

The so-called EMEA CD was very minimalist, with the CD jacket only showing the OS/2 logo and the text “OS/2 2.1”. The CD itself was not much more verbose.

On the other hand, the installation diskettes were labeled in the appropriate language, as was the packaging. Printed documentation was likewise translated.

The “EMEA” CD didn’t quite cover Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. It included UK English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Portuguese, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, Canadian French, and Brazilian Portuguese versions. As mentioned above, the box only contained boot floppies for one language, but it was possible to manually create installation floppies for any of the provided NLVs from the CD as all the necessary files were included on the CD.

The UK version of OS/2 2.1 was almost indistinguishable from the US release. The documentation used US English spelling, for example. Essentially the only difference was a different default keyboard layout and country setting.

The other language versions were rather more obviously different. OS/2 NLVs also shipped appropriate national version of Win-OS/2. Beyond the translated user interface, there weren’t significant differences.

DBCS OS/2 2.1

There were fairly significant differences between the DBCS versions of OS/2. This pertained especially to input method editors (IMEs), Win-OS/2, and DOS support.

The DBCS versions of OS/2 supported specialized keyboard layouts and often also supported special hardware (e.g. the IBM PS/55, a PS/2 model designed for the Japanese market). On the other hand, special hardware was not required and DBCS versions ran on standard PC compatibles as well.

Installing DBCS OS/2 was usually not entirely straightforward for a person not familiar with Japanese, Chinese or Korean, but it was greatly facilitated by the fact that IBM used the same key combinations as the US version of OS/2 in the installation screens and dialogs. This was taken to an extreme in the shutdown screen:

All DBCS versions of OS/2 simply said “End. Ctrl+Alt+Del or Power Off.”; that’s of course English but not the same text as the English versions of OS/2…

The DBCS versions of OS/2 were significantly more complex when it came to DOS and Win-OS/2 support, and somewhat inconsistent.

For example the Korean version of OS/2 2.1 came with three different DOS prompts: DOS, DOS/K, DOS/V. DOS was basically the US English version of OS/2 DOS support. DOS/K supported both the Korean and US codepage, while DOS/V only used DBCS codepages. Both DOS/K and DOS/V were localized into Korean.

All DBCS versions of OS/2 came with the appropriate DOS/V support. Note that a full-screen DOS/V session used graphics mode (in order to display complex ideographs), not text mode.

Win-OS/2 support also varied somewhat across DBCS OS/2 releases, presumably because the underlying Windows 3.1 support wasn’t uniform.

Some later OS/2 versions even shipped with multiple Win-OS/2 versions (e.g. Japanese and US), likely because some software designed for the US market wasn’t fully compatible with Japanese Windows 3.x.

Full-screen DBCS OS/2 sessions also used graphics mode:

For this and other reasons, DBCS versions of OS/2  required somewhat modified display drivers (both full-screen and Presentation Manager). That of course complicated the lives of DBCS OS/2 users. It may be worth noting that the graphical text mode support was initialized almost immediately when booting OS/2:

For reference, a list of DBCS OS/2 versions and their abbreviations follows: OS/2 J2.1 (Japanese), OS/2 H2.1 (Hanguel—Korean), OS/2 T2.1 (Traditional Chinese, Taiwan and Hong Kong), OS/2 P2.1 (People’s Republic of China, Simplified Chinese).

Support of Other Countries

OS/2 2.1 was localized into a relatively small set of languages, but supported a much wider set of languages and countries with the appropriate country, codepage, and keyboard settings. Such indirectly supported languages included Turkish, Polish, Czech, Hungarian, or Icelandic.

Note

The OS/2 Museum is looking for the remaining NLVs of OS/2 2.1: Russian, Hebrew, Thai, and Arabic.

References

Introduction to OS/2 2.1 National Language Support, GG24-4213-00, IBM Redbook, May 1994